Home Strategy Marketing 'I was never involved,' Gauteng ex-MEC fights back against PPE corruption findings

‘I was never involved,’ Gauteng ex-MEC fights back against PPE corruption findings

  • Former Gauteng health MEC Bandile Masuku is challenging the findings of the SIU against him in the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria.
  • After finding himself at the centre of a PPE tender scandal, Masuku insists he did not influence the decision to centralise the procurement of PPE or the awarding of tenders.
  • Masuku has also said he was first to suggest investigations into irregular PEE procurement.

A lawyer representing former Gauteng health MEC Bandile Masuku says, for the past three months, his client has endured an “onslaught of unfounded allegations” that were used to “tarnish” his integrity and image.

Masuku has approached the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria, to review findings by the Special Investigating Unit. 

He has denied any involvement in a PPE procurement scandal that saw him removed from his post.

The SIU recently placed Masuku at the centre of processes in the health department from where presidential spokesperson Khusela Diko’s husband won a R125-million tender to supply personal protective equipment (PPE).

Masuku’s lawyer Mojalefa Motalane said:

“For a period of three months, Dr Masuku has endured an onslaught of unfounded allegations that have been used to tarnish his professional integrity and image, thereby violating a wide range of his rights in law and denying him justice.”

The matter is expected to be heard on Tuesday 24 November.

Masuku argued that the findings and recommendations made by the SIU against him were unconstitutional and therefore invalid, and requested that they be set aside.

READ | PPE tender scandal: Bandile Masuku to challenge SIU findings in High Court

The SIU issued a letter to Premier David Makhuru on 1 October, which recommended he take administrative action against Masuku.

“The [SIU] went on to find that I instructed the centralised and motivated or supported it for ‘nefarious purposes’,” said Masuku in a lengthy affidavit supplied to the court.

He said the decision to centralise procurement was taken by the provincial government in line with various practice notes issued by the national Department of Finance and were not influenced by him.

He added that his department’s priority was to protect frontline workers and prevent the spread of Covid-19, which saw the provision of PPE take a central role in the department’s response plan.

“To regulate this process, the provincial government, in line with the then national treasury practice note, resolved that the procurement of PPE and other medical related equipment would be centralised to the department. The department, neither through me not any of its officials, initiated the centralisation of the Covid-19 procurement,” said Masuku.

The pressure was to procure as much PPE as the department could, said Masuku.

The potential shortfall of PPE saw the provincial government extending a broad invitation to service providers who could supply the needed goods and services, to approach the department, which Masuku believes was transparent and consistent with the Constitution.

“I, as an executive authority, was never involved in the PPE procurement nor could I have asked to be involved. Any involvement would amount to unlawful interference with operation matters that do not fall within the ambit of functions performed by an executive authority,” he said. 

He added that he was not involved with supply chain management and was not aware that Royal Bhaca Projects (RBP) had made a bid.

“From 30 March, various service providers were appointed and these included RBP. The appointment of RBP appears to have followed a quotation which was dealt with by the supply chain management officials,” said Masuku.

“I was never involved in, nor was I aware that that these appointments were being made and for what amounts.”

‘I was surprised’

He said he was surprised to hear RBP had bid to the department.

“Since Mrs Diko and I were comrades and friends, I was surprised that her husband has received a PPE contract from the Department.

“I believed that I should at the very least have been informed that it had tendered to provide PPE. Had I been advised, I would have told RBP not to bid for the provision of goods and services, as I would any other friend, family member of close associate,” he said. 

He added that Diko said she was not aware of the bid and that following a conversation she had with her husband, the contract had been cancelled.

Masuku has also clarified an email referenced by the SIU, between RBP and himself.

ALSO READ | ANC Gauteng recommends Masuku, Diko head to provincial DC over Covid-19 corruption allegations

He said he had a discussion with the erstwhile CFO about providing a list of service providers to the Motsepe Foundation, as the foundation wanted to donate PPE to the department.

This email was sent as a confirmation that the list had been provided, and Masuku said he did not open or read it.

Masuku said that he was the one to urge an investigation into PPE procurement take place after concerns were raised by staff.

He also said he approached the Gauteng Audit Services to carry out the investigation, and that the matter had been escalated to the premier and the premier’s Integrity Unit.

Masuka said:

“Before the matter was in the public eye or was reported on by the media…I took a decision that an investigation to uncover any wrong doing had to commence. At the time I was under no pressure from any political or media stakeholder to commence the investigation, I did it because I believed it was the right thing to do.”

Masuku added that he volunteered to take special leave during the investigation, so that it not appear to be influencing the investigation.

READ | Bandile Masuku: Independent report findings ‘contradicts SIU’, clears him of hand in PPE graft

Masuku and Diko were also expected to appear before the Gauteng ANC disciplinary committee regarding the pending ANC disciplinary hearing.

Motalane added Masuku was ready to appear before the committee.

Source link

Must Read

How To Succeed When Taking Your Company Overseas

03We international lawyers often get calls and emails from companies looking to set up a...

China on the G7 Agenda

The 47th G7 summit was held from June 11-13 in Cornwall. China is, of course,...

How to Reduce Your Foreign Manufactured Product Liability Risks

How often do you stop to think about the ubiquitous “Made in China” label? If...

Socialist-Themed Vegan Food Company Lays Off Workers Without Notice Or Severance

A self-described socially conscious vegan food manufacturer laid off its entire production staff in North Carolina on Friday, infuriating workers who said the...

Will Hong Kong’s New Film Censorship Law Kill Off Local Production?

In 1988, Hong Kong passed a Film Censorship Ordinance that updated previous guidelines governing film...