Anyway, one of our manufacturing lawyers responded by sending a China product development agreement, along with the following brief explanation of if:
This is an example of what we do for China and this pretty much also tracks what we do in the rest of the world as well. We have done similar agreements for nearly all of Asia and for much of Latin America as well. I have intentionally given you one of our simpler, more basic such agreements, figuring it will serve better as a starting point for both you and the client. It hits the basic issues.
The basic structure for design agreements are as follows:
1. What will be designed.
2. The costs and how those costs will allocated and paid.
3. The milestones for completion, with payment tied to these milestones and remedies provided if any of the milestones are not met. This is the complicated part.
4. Specific deliverables, again tied to milestones. This needs to be clear. The contract should set out exactly what will be delivered at each milestone and the criteria for “success”.
5. Deliverables at the end of the project: say, five working prototypes with all design documents, with the deliverables meeting specific criteria as a standard for success.
6. IP ownership of the result: standard work for hire language and related.
7. NNN provisions. This is especially important because we need to protect our client’s IP whether the product development deal succeeds or fails.
8. Governing law and dispute resolution.
One reason these agreements can get so complicated is because there is usually an added manufacturing component. That is, the product designer is usually also the potential future manufacturer. If that is not part of your project, the document can be limited to the outline above. Failure is very common, so dealing with failure within your agreement is an important feature. Failure typically occurs when the design is not adequate or when timelines are not met.
Happy to assist in any way possible.